IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Evan Adams Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-10-11 Country: USA
Trine
NCHA D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Shreveport Mudbugs NAHL 55 2 6 8 0.145 0.0535 0.0543 0.1538 0.1562
2025-26 Shreveport Mudbugs NAHL 58 2 13 15 0.259 0.0950 0.0918 0.2733 0.2642
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
25%
NCAA D2/D3
45%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19792
Defenseman overall
#3428
Defenseman born in 2005
#5846
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Trine Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Nick Magill-Diaz
0.30
actual FR PPG at Trine
Nicolas White
0.54
actual FR PPG at Trine
Brent Jones
0.52
actual FR PPG at Trine
Brett Wall
0.00
actual FR PPG at Trine

D2/3 Comparables

Luke Dillon
Wisconsin-Stout · 2010-11
0.296 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Gow
St. Norbert · 2002-03
0.345 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Wade Richardson
Manhattanville · 2000-01
0.280 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.