IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cole Barrett Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-04-02 Country: Canada
Albertus Magnus
UCHC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 — AJHL 39 11 18 29 0.744 0.2494 0.2545 0.6881 0.7022
2024-25 Camrose Kodiaks AJHL 27 6 8 14 0.518 0.1739 0.1682 0.4798 0.4641
2025-26 Whitecourt Wolverines AJHL 42 15 18 33 0.786 0.2635 0.2402 0.7271 0.6629
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
28%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#32131
Forward overall
#1918
Forward born in 2005
#1035
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG

Albertus Magnus Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Cameron Weitzman
0.75
actual FR PPG at Albertus Magnus
Bayley Kubara
0.33
actual FR PPG at Albertus Magnus
Samuel Lozinski
0.71
actual FR PPG at Albertus Magnus
Tyler Ignazzitto
0.92
actual FR PPG at Albertus Magnus

D2/3 Comparables

Noah Trathen
UMass Dartmouth · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Anthony Piccininno
Alvernia · 2024-25
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Manny Gialedakis
SUNY Oswego · 2012-13
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.