IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cameron Weitzman Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-06-22 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 New Hampshire Avalanche EHL 33 17 12 29 0.879 0.2030 0.2042 0.4300 0.4326
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Albertus Magnus D3 UCHC GR 25 7 10 17 0.680
2022-23 Albertus Magnus D3 UCHC SR 25 5 14 19 0.760
2021-22 Albertus Magnus D3 UCHC JR 25 11 9 20 0.800
2020-21 Albertus Magnus D1 UCHC SO 2 0 1 1 0.500
2020-21 Albertus Magnus D3 UCHC SO 2 0 1 1 0.500
2019-20 Albertus Magnus D1 UCHC FR 24 11 7 18 0.750
2019-20 Albertus Magnus D3 UCHC FR 24 11 7 18 0.750
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.75
2019-20 · Albertus Magnus
+329.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
38%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15499
Forward overall
#732
Forward born in 1999
#243
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Zach Saar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alfred Larsson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matt Pohlkamp
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tanner Pond
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Sean Wilson
Lebanon Valley · 2006-07
0.350 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Devin Brink
SUNY Geneseo · 2014-15
0.654 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Derek Thorogood
Marian · 2012-13
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.