IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Vincent Bronzo Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-07-16 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Nichols
CNE D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 New Jersey Rockets NCDC 4 0 1 1 0.250 0.1019 0.1122 0.2009 0.2212
2024-25 Watertown Shamrocks NAHL 1 1 0 1 1.000 0.3674 0.3872 1.0555 1.1123
2025-26 New Jersey Jr. Titans NAHL 22 2 5 7 0.318 0.1169 0.1174 0.3359 0.3375
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
30%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#41070
Forward overall
#2462
Forward born in 2006

D1 Comparables

Josh Erickson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Zach Saar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matt Pohlkamp
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average
NCAAe PPG

Nichols Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

JoJo Bojanowski
0.76
actual FR PPG at Nichols
Gustav Sandberg
0.00
actual FR PPG at Nichols
Curtis Carlson
0.56
actual FR PPG at Nichols
Brien Thompson
0.50
actual FR PPG at Nichols

D2/3 Comparables

Max Blitz
Fredonia · 2015-16
0.364 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Garrett Hendrickson
Concordia · 2011-12
0.885 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jordan Martin
Wisconsin-Superior · 2016-17
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.