← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brody Olson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-11-26 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Bethel
MIAC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Duluth East USHS-MN 26 0 5 5 0.192 0.0243 0.0243 0.0467 0.0467
2022-23 Duluth East USHS-MN 23 2 2 4 0.174 0.0220 0.0220 0.0422 0.0422
2023-24 Champlin Park USHS-MN 19 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Janesville Jets NAHL 5 0 1 1 0.200 0.0735 0.0788 0.2111 0.2263
2025-26 Janesville Jets NAHL 55 4 8 12 0.218 0.0802 0.0820 0.2303 0.2356
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
25%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
28%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#21483
Defenseman overall
#3467
Defenseman born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG
→ Army (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Maine (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.04 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.02 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG

Bethel Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

0.00
actual FR PPG at Bethel
0.00
actual FR PPG at Bethel
0.48
actual FR PPG at Bethel
0.00
actual FR PPG at Bethel

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Stout · 2009-10
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Becker · 2017-18
0.476 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Gustavus Adolphus · 2023-24
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.