IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dante DeBueriis Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-10-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 New Jersey Jr. Titans NA3HL 46 1 9 10 0.217 0.0240 0.0253 0.0686 0.0723
2023-24 New Jersey Jr. Titans NA3HL 45 6 17 23 0.511 0.0565 0.0568 0.1614 0.1624
2024-25 New Jersey Jr. Titans NA3HL 47 7 14 21 0.447 0.0494 0.0471 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Western Connecticut D3 LittleEast FR 20 0 3 3 0.150
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.15
2025-26 · Western Connecticut
+211.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17829
Defenseman overall
#3257
Defenseman born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Sebastian Meltzer
Connecticut College · 2010-11
0.273 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Johnny Ramoundos
Fredonia · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Justin Brandt
Tufts · 2017-18
0.474 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.