IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Easton Swift Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-12-07 Country: USA
Norwich
LittleEast D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Loomis Chaffee NE-Prep 25 1 0 1 0.040 0.0079 0.0079 0.0182 0.0182
2022-23 Cretin-Derham Hall USHS-MN 30 4 4 8 0.267 0.0338 0.0338 0.0648 0.0648
2023-24 Cretin-Derham Hall USHS-MN 31 11 17 28 0.903 0.1143 0.1143 0.2194 0.2194
2024-25 Mercer Chiefs NCDC 36 12 11 23 0.639 0.2605 0.2674 — —
2025-26 Corpus Christi IceRays NAHL 57 15 24 39 0.684 0.2514 0.2449 0.7222 0.7037
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
40%
Age-Out / Club
15%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16026
Forward overall
#834
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Joseph-Matthew Manno
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Siiro
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG

Norwich Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Tory Allan
0.72
actual FR PPG at Norwich
Emmond Bell
0.64
actual FR PPG at Norwich
Matt McCann
0.63
actual FR PPG at Norwich
Frank D'Ancona
0.86
actual FR PPG at Norwich

D2/3 Comparables

Connor Beatty
Endicott · 2018-19
1.333 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Chase Nieuwendyk
SUNY Brockport · 2010-11
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brian Hennessey
SUNY Oswego · 2012-13
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.