IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

William Forsberg Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-09-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 La Ronge Ice Wolves SJHL 53 9 14 23 0.434 0.1112 0.1121 0.3216 0.3241
2024-25 — SJHL 37 7 6 13 0.351 0.0900 0.0859 0.2604 0.2485
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Canton D3 SUNYAC FR 11 0 3 3 0.273
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2025-26 · Canton
+230.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
28%
NCAA D2/D3
57%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#42945
Forward overall
#2836
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jack Wandmacher
Saint John's · 2022-23
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jordan Baird
St. Scholastica · 2005-06
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Redmon
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2015-16
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.