← New Search ↗ Social Card

Evan Dantas Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-07-28 Country: Canada
Utica
UCHC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Elliot Lake Vikings NOJHL 57 21 37 58 1.018 0.1699 0.1836 0.4236 0.4578
2023-24 Toronto Patriots OJHL 52 13 12 25 0.481 0.1178 0.1209 0.3310 0.3398
2024-25 Burlington Cougars OJHL 55 21 40 61 1.109 0.2718 0.2650 0.7636 0.7446
2025-26 NAHL 55 25 30 55 1.000 0.3674 0.3513 1.0555 1.0094
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

48%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
28%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14220
Forward overall
#707
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG

Utica Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

1.00
actual FR PPG at Utica
0.81
actual FR PPG at Utica
0.78
actual FR PPG at Utica
1.06
actual FR PPG at Utica

D2/3 Comparables

Concordia · 2012-13
0.867 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2021-22
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Endicott · 2014-15
1.143 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.