IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mack Diggins Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-05-31 Country: USA
Minnesota Duluth
Verbal NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 58 16 31 47 0.810 0.2977 0.3270 0.8564 0.9407
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

50%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
40%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14186
Forward overall
#215
Forward born in 2008
#604
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Frederik Tiffels
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.66 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Mike Marnell
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.49 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average
NCAAe PPG
Avery Peterson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jack Jenkins
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.42 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Luke Stork
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Minnesota Duluth Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Jayson Shaugabay
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.72
actual FR PPG at Minnesota Duluth
Max Plante
USHS-MN 2021-22
1.22
actual FR PPG at Minnesota Duluth
Harper Bentz
USHS-MN 2021-22
0.33
actual FR PPG at Minnesota Duluth
Zam Plante
USHS-MN 2021-22
0.61
actual FR PPG at Minnesota Duluth

D2/3 Comparables

Devin Niles
Fitchburg State · 2023-24
1.500 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Fiume
Neumann · 2000-01
1.040 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor Treacy
SUNY Potsdam · 2002-03
0.960 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.