← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cameron Doran Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-02-21 Country: USA
St. John Fisher
UCHC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 52 21 35 56 1.077 0.2639 0.2652 0.7414 0.7451
2024-25 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 48 24 31 55 1.146 0.2808 0.2678 0.7889 0.7523
2025-26 Rochester Jr. Americans NAHL 55 8 9 17 0.309 0.1136 0.1062 0.3263 0.3050
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
57%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22796
Forward overall
#1270
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

St. John Fisher Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

0.00
actual FR PPG at St. John Fisher
0.00
actual FR PPG at St. John Fisher
0.32
actual FR PPG at St. John Fisher
0.29
actual FR PPG at St. John Fisher

D2/3 Comparables

UMass Dartmouth · 2022-23
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Bryn Athyn · 2016-17
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Salem State · 2014-15
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.