IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Evan Regan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-06-23 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Babson
LittleEast D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Berkshire School NE-Prep 32 17 24 41 1.281 0.2538 0.2538 0.5837 0.5837
2024-25 Berkshire School NE-Prep 32 20 21 41 1.281 0.2538 0.2538 0.5837 0.5837
2025-26 Danbury Jr. Hat Tricks NAHL 36 3 9 12 0.333 0.1225 0.1227 0.3518 0.3523
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
22%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20065
Forward overall
#876
Forward born in 2006

D1 Comparables

Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Josh Erickson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Zach Saar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matt Pohlkamp
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average
NCAAe PPG

Babson Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Egan Schmitt
0.44
actual FR PPG at Babson
Matt Wiesner
0.88
actual FR PPG at Babson
Sam Sibold
0.36
actual FR PPG at Babson
Andrew Holland
0.72
actual FR PPG at Babson

D2/3 Comparables

Adam Moodie
Skidmore · 2014-15
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Shane Tracy
Curry · 2013-14
0.353 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Steve Gerbis
SUNY Morrisville · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.