← New Search ↗ Social Card

Gerrit Lansing Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-07-31 Country: USA
Brown
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Taft NE-Prep 5 0 2 2 0.400 0.0792 0.0792 0.1822 0.1822
2022-23 Taft NE-Prep 18 1 4 5 0.278 0.0550 0.0550 0.1266 0.1266
2023-24 Taft NE-Prep 25 2 11 13 0.520 0.1030 0.1030 0.2369 0.2369
2024-25 Jersey Hitmen NCDC 38 3 4 7 0.184 0.0751 0.0758 0.1481 0.1494
2025-26 New Jersey Jr. Titans NAHL 15 0 5 5 0.333 0.1225 0.1172 0.3518 0.3366
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
38%
Age-Out / Club
18%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12897
Defenseman overall
#2574
Defenseman born in 2005

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

Brown Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NE-Prep 2019-20
0.00
actual FR PPG at Brown
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.30
actual FR PPG at Brown
USHL 2018-19
0.14
actual FR PPG at Brown
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.17
actual FR PPG at Brown

D2/3 Comparables

Alvernia · 2023-24
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Potsdam · 2023-24
0.308 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stout · 2023-24
0.312 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.