← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jonathan Ziskie Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-03-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Minnesota Magicians NAHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Fargo Force USHL 15 0 2 2 0.133 0.0786 0.0786 0.4004 0.4004
2020-21 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 38 5 11 16 0.421 0.1547 0.1547 0.4445 0.4445
2021-22 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 48 8 25 33 0.688 0.2526 0.2367 0.7257 0.6799
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Niagara D1 AHA SR 32 4 7 11 0.344
2024-25 Niagara D1 AHA JR 7 1 0 1 0.143
2023-24 Niagara D1 AHA SO 27 2 6 8 0.296
2022-23 Niagara D1 AHA FR 31 1 3 4 0.129
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.13
2022-23 · Niagara
-42.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

48%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
25%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6964
Defenseman overall
#1498
Defenseman born in 2001
#2515
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Brockport · 2012-13
0.905 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Canton · 2023-24
0.933 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Norbert · 2007-08
0.682 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.