← New Search ↗ Social Card

Derek Paige Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1983-05-02 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Prince George Spruce Kings BCHL 60 2 9 11 0.183 0.0706 0.0751 0.2671 0.2843
2001-02 Prince George Spruce Kings BCHL 60 9 24 33 0.550 0.2119 0.2138 0.8014 0.8087
2002-03 BCHL 60 5 33 38 0.633 0.2440 0.2357 0.9228 0.8914
2003-04 Coquitlam Express BCHL 54 4 23 27 0.500 0.1926 0.1775 0.7286 0.6714
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2007-08 Wisconsin-Superior D3 SR 27 1 13 14 0.518
2006-07 Wisconsin-Superior D3 JR 22 2 14 16 0.727
2005-06 Wisconsin-Superior D3 SO 29 0 11 11 0.379
2004-05 Wisconsin-Superior D3 FR 28 2 5 7 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2004-05 · Wisconsin-Superior
+31.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#6284
Defenseman overall
#785
Defenseman born in 1983
#1476
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Elmira · 2004-05
0.786 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Buffalo State · 2024-25
0.720 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2011-12
0.815 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.