IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Blayne Goodman Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1981-06-09 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 54 1 9 10 0.185 0.0721 0.0699 0.2701 0.2619
2001-02 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 57 7 14 21 0.368 0.1434 0.1311 0.5372 0.4912
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2005-06 Wentworth D3 — SR 26 8 17 25 0.962
2004-05 Wentworth D3 — JR 25 8 9 17 0.680
2003-04 Wentworth D3 — SO 28 9 18 27 0.964
2002-03 Wentworth D3 — FR 29 4 16 20 0.690
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.69
2002-03 · Wentworth
+585.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#10489
Defenseman overall
#766
Defenseman born in 1981
#2844
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Casey Nelson
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Corey Domenico
SUNY Oswego · 2009-10
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Donovan Hall
Neumann · 2004-05
0.684 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Lewis
Lake Forest · 2012-13
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.