← New Search ↗ Social Card

Trevor Mitchell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-05-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 4 0 1 1 0.250 0.1475 0.1475 0.7366 0.7366
2020-21 USHL 37 1 5 6 0.162 0.0957 0.0957 0.4779 0.4779
2021-22 NAHL 46 1 8 9 0.196 0.0695 0.0725 0.2055 0.2145
2022-23 NAHL 52 2 6 8 0.154 0.0546 0.0543 0.1615 0.1606
2023-24 Odessa Jackalopes NAHL 56 5 15 20 0.357 0.1268 0.1201 0.3749 0.3550
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SO 22 1 5 6 0.273
2024-25 Northern Michigan D1 CCHA 14 0 1 1 0.071
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.07
2024-25 · Northern Michigan
-19.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
28%
NCAA D2/D3
45%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16760
Defenseman overall
#3036
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Stevenson · 2015-16
0.458 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stout · 2015-16
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Bowdoin · 2024-25
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.