← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kevin MacKay Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-04-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
1995-96 North Iowa Huskies USHL 31 1 2 3 0.097 0.0571 0.0605 0.2852 0.3023
2018-19 Dexter NE-Prep 30 3 7 10 0.333 0.0643 0.0643 0.1525 0.1525
2019-20 Aberdeen Wings NAHL 9 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Aberdeen Wings NAHL 45 6 13 19 0.422 0.1500 0.1500 0.4433 0.4433
2021-22 Aberdeen Wings NAHL 59 4 14 18 0.305 0.1084 0.1021 0.3203 0.3017
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Trinity D3 NESCAC SR 11 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Trinity D3 NESCAC JR 18 1 1 2 0.111
2023-24 Trinity D3 NESCAC SO 11 1 0 1 0.091
2022-23 Trinity D3 NESCAC FR 7 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
60%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9617
Defenseman overall
#1882
Defenseman born in 2001

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Concordia (WI) · 2011-12
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2012-13
0.312 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Suffolk · 2018-19
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.