← New Search ↗ Social Card

Aaron Berman Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1984-07-22 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2001-02 West Kelowna Warriors BCHL 53 1 4 5 0.094 0.0363 0.0389 0.1370 0.1466
2002-03 West Kelowna Warriors BCHL 11 1 1 2 0.182 0.0700 0.0719 0.2642 0.2714
2003-04 West Kelowna Warriors BCHL 60 3 22 25 0.417 0.1606 0.1578 0.6055 0.5950
2004-05 West Kelowna Warriors BCHL 50 4 17 21 0.420 0.1618 0.1514 0.6103 0.5712
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2007-08 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC JR 15 1 1 2 0.133
2006-07 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC SO 25 3 11 14 0.560
2005-06 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC FR 14 1 2 3 0.214
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.21
2005-06 · Wisconsin-Superior
+47.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#12275
Defenseman overall
#1143
Defenseman born in 1984
#2233
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

UMass Boston · 2011-12
1.037 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
New England College · 2018-19
0.304 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2011-12
0.957 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.