← New Search ↗ Social Card

Riley Brueck Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-05-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Lincoln Stars USHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Oklahoma Warriors NAHL 48 1 10 11 0.229 0.0842 0.0842 0.2419 0.2419
2021-22 Oklahoma Warriors NAHL 47 18 15 33 0.702 0.2580 0.2692 0.7411 0.7734
2022-23 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 24 0 3 3 0.125 0.0737 0.0701 0.3754 0.3569
2023-24 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 33 2 7 9 0.273 0.1609 0.1450 0.8190 0.7381
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Union D1 ECAC SO 36 10 7 17 0.472
2024-25 Union D1 ECAC 33 3 7 10 0.303
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.30
2024-25 · Union
+207.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
28%
NCAA D2/D3
50%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#28081
Forward overall
#1614
Forward born in 2003
#2657
in USHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Buffalo State · 2016-17
0.889 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Cortland · 2023-24
0.696 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Lake Forest · 2021-22
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.