IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Paul Crowder Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1985-02-12 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2002-03 Powell River Kings BCHL 58 3 11 14 0.241 0.0930 0.0981 0.3517 0.3711
2003-04 Powell River Kings BCHL 58 19 39 58 1.000 0.3853 0.3894 1.4571 1.4727
2004-05 — BCHL 47 14 34 48 1.021 0.3935 0.3794 1.4881 1.4346
2005-06 Coquitlam Express BCHL 14 3 10 13 0.929 0.3578 0.3270 1.3531 1.2367
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA JR 35 14 19 33 0.943
2007-08 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA SO 35 7 16 23 0.657
2006-07 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA FR 37 11 13 24 0.649
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.30
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.65
2006-07 · Alaska Anchorage
+117.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#10818
Forward overall
#337
Forward born in 1985
#346
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tyler Seltenreich
New England · 2016-17
1.207 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Stuart Stefan
Castleton · 2006-07
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Chris Berry
Wisconsin-Superior · 2005-06
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.