| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-19 | Chippewa Steel | NAHL | 59 | 15 | 20 | 35 | 0.593 | 0.2350 | 0.2530 | 0.6228 | 0.6706 |
| 2019-20 | Chippewa Steel | NAHL | 37 | 14 | 28 | 42 | 1.135 | 0.4497 | 0.4497 | — | — |
| 2020-21 | Des Moines Buccaneers | USHL | 45 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 0.222 | 0.1366 | 0.1366 | 0.6546 | 0.6546 |
| 2021-22 | — | USHL | 56 | 20 | 18 | 38 | 0.679 | 0.4171 | 0.3704 | 1.9993 | 1.7756 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Canisius | D1 | AHA | SR | 35 | 8 | 18 | 26 | 0.743 |
| 2024-25 | Canisius | D1 | AHA | — | 22 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 0.227 |
| 2023-24 | Canisius | D1 | AHA | — | 21 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 0.238 |
| 2022-23 | Maine | D1 | HockeyEast | — | 24 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 0.208 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.