← New Search ↗ Social Card

Killian Kiecker-Olson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-01-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Chippewa Steel NAHL 59 15 20 35 0.593 0.2179 0.2346 0.6261 0.6741
2019-20 Chippewa Steel NAHL 37 14 28 42 1.135 0.4170 0.4170
2020-21 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 45 5 5 10 0.222 0.1311 0.1311 0.6674 0.6674
2021-22 USHL 56 20 18 38 0.679 0.4003 0.3555 2.0381 1.8101
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Canisius D1 AHA SR 35 8 18 26 0.743
2024-25 Canisius D1 AHA 22 3 2 5 0.227
2023-24 Canisius D1 AHA 21 2 3 5 0.238
2022-23 Maine D1 HockeyEast 24 1 4 5 0.208
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.21
2022-23 · Maine
-20.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

65%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13072
Forward overall
#608
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Union (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Developing
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Adrian · 2006-07
1.586 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Salve Regina · 2023-24
1.385 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Lebanon Valley · 2014-15
0.773 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.