← New Search ↗ Social Card

Owen Ozar Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-04-05 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Flin Flon Bombers SJHL 1 0 1 1 1.000 0.2562 0.2779 0.7538 0.8178
2018-19 Trail Smoke Eaters BCHL 42 14 12 26 0.619 0.2385 0.2429 0.9008 0.9174
2019-20 Trail Smoke Eaters BCHL 54 26 40 66 1.222 0.4709 0.4709 1.7787 1.7787
2020-21 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 52 15 19 34 0.654 0.3857 0.3857 1.9636 1.9636
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Bowling Green D1 CCHA 15 1 0 1 0.067
2023-24 Bowling Green D1 CCHA 35 5 4 9 0.257
2022-23 Denver D1 NCHC 27 1 5 6 0.222
2021-22 Denver D1 NCHC 21 0 1 1 0.048
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.05
2021-22 · Denver
-78.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

50%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
48%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10306
Forward overall
#431
Forward born in 2000

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG
→ RPI (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.42 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Denver
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.36 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.53 PPG
→ Maine (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2020-21
0.409 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Amherst · 2010-11
0.857 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2004-05
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.