← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan O'Hara Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-07-18 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 St. Michael's Buzzers OJHL 5 0 1 1 0.200 0.0490 0.0550 0.1377 0.1546
2018-19 Oakville Blades OJHL 53 20 23 43 0.811 0.1988 0.2135 0.5586 0.5999
2019-20 Oakville Blades OJHL 46 27 30 57 1.239 0.3037 0.3037 0.8531 0.8531
2020-21 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 52 16 15 31 0.596 0.3517 0.3517 1.7906 1.7906
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Bowling Green D1 CCHA SR 36 11 22 33 0.917
2023-24 Bowling Green D1 CCHA JR 26 10 8 18 0.692
2022-23 Bowling Green D1 CCHA SO 36 11 19 30 0.833
2021-22 Bowling Green D1 CCHA FR 33 4 4 8 0.242
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.24
2021-22 · Bowling Green
+88.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
60%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12821
Forward overall
#592
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Harvard (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.42 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Bentley (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.75 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Concordia · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Norwich · 2002-03
1.240 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Marian · 2015-16
0.923 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.