← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan O'Hara Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-07-18 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 St. Michael's Buzzers OJHL 5 0 1 1 0.200 0.0601 0.0675 0.1369 0.1537
2018-19 Oakville Blades OJHL 53 20 23 43 0.811 0.2437 0.2617 0.5553 0.5963
2019-20 Oakville Blades OJHL 46 27 30 57 1.239 0.3722 0.3722 0.8482 0.8482
2020-21 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 52 16 15 31 0.596 0.3665 0.3665 1.7565 1.7565
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Bowling Green D1 CCHA SR 36 11 22 33 0.917
2023-24 Bowling Green D1 CCHA JR 26 10 8 18 0.692
2022-23 Bowling Green D1 CCHA SO 36 11 19 30 0.833
2021-22 Bowling Green D1 CCHA FR 33 4 4 8 0.242
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.24
2021-22 · Bowling Green
+53.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
57%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12343
Forward overall
#547
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.42 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Harvard (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.75 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.59 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Norwich · 2002-03
1.240 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Cortland · 2003-04
0.917 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Olaf · 2014-15
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.