IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brett Hextall Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-04-02 Country: USA
2008 · Round 5, Pick #159  ·  Phoenix Coyotes
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Penticton Vees BCHL 59 18 27 45 0.763 0.2939 0.2989 1.1100 1.1289
2007-08 Penticton Vees BCHL 54 24 48 72 1.333 0.5137 0.4948 1.9404 1.8689
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 North Dakota D1 WCHA-orig JR 39 13 16 29 0.744
2009-10 North Dakota D1 NCHC SO 34 14 12 26 0.765
2008-09 North Dakota D1 NCHC FR 42 12 14 26 0.619
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.36
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.62
2008-09 · North Dakota
+73.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#8815
Forward overall
#358
Forward born in 1988
#193
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Dominik Shine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.90 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Biggs
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Miami (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Average
NCAAe PPG
Phil Marinaccio
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Michael Vecchione
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Union (0.89 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Chad McDonald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.48 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Travis Janke
Norwich · 2009-10
1.258 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Collin Patterson
UMass Dartmouth · 2022-23
1.125 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Doug Lindensmith
Norwich · 2010-11
1.044 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.