← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joey Massingham Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-05-21 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Cowichan Valley Capitals BCHL 56 8 11 19 0.339 0.1307 0.1403 0.4944 0.5309
2007-08 Cowichan Valley Capitals BCHL 60 6 10 16 0.267 0.1028 0.1048 0.3886 0.3963
2008-09 Cowichan Valley Capitals BCHL 60 9 12 21 0.350 0.1349 0.1319 0.5100 0.4987
2009-10 Cowichan Valley Capitals BCHL 60 6 10 16 0.267 0.1028 0.0949 0.3886 0.3588
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Wisconsin-Superior D3 BigTen SR 29 3 5 8 0.276
2012-13 Wisconsin-Superior D3 JR 27 10 14 24 0.889
2011-12 Wisconsin-Superior D3 SO 22 4 10 14 0.636
2010-11 Wisconsin-Superior D3 FR 28 5 10 15 0.536
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.54
2010-11 · Wisconsin-Superior
+470.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#44637
Forward overall
#1481
Forward born in 1989
#2549
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

New England College · 2006-07
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stout · 2015-16
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2016-17
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.