IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Casey Fratkin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1989-06-05 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Merritt Centennials BCHL 47 5 5 10 0.213 0.0820 0.0882 0.3097 0.3332
2007-08 — BCHL 15 1 2 3 0.200 0.0771 0.0788 0.2911 0.2975
2008-09 Merritt Centennials BCHL 51 3 5 8 0.157 0.0605 0.0593 0.2283 0.2237
2009-10 — AJHL 31 1 9 10 0.323 0.1082 0.1008 0.2985 0.2780
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC — 20 0 2 2 0.100
2012-13 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC — 14 0 3 3 0.214
2011-12 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC — 17 0 3 3 0.176
2010-11 Elmira D3 UCHC — 4 0 1 1 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2010-11 · Elmira
+214.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#22004
Defenseman overall
#1796
Defenseman born in 1989
#3005
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Derrick Brooks
Wisconsin-Superior · 2013-14
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Jerad Tafoya
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2013-14
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Mark Tomaschek
Southern Maine · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.