← New Search ↗ Social Card

Thomas Sinclair Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-12-26 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 St. Michael's Buzzers OJHL 6 2 0 2 0.333 0.0817 0.0936 0.2295 0.2630
2019-20 St. Michael's Buzzers OJHL 45 18 26 44 0.978 0.2397 0.2397 0.6732 0.6732
2020-21 Muskegon Lumberjacks USHL 37 4 14 18 0.486 0.2870 0.2870 1.4612 1.4612
2021-22 USHL 15 2 4 6 0.400 0.2360 0.2324 1.2014 1.1831
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Vermont D1 HockeyEast SR 34 4 6 10 0.294
2024-25 Vermont D1 HockeyEast SR 33 3 5 8 0.242
2023-24 Vermont D1 HockeyEast JR 32 5 4 9 0.281
2022-23 Vermont D1 HockeyEast 33 2 2 4 0.121
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2022-23 · Vermont
-19.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

65%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18737
Forward overall
#999
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ RPI (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Cornell (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Thomas · 2016-17
0.474 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2011-12
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2011-12
1.296 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.