IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jordan Kwas Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-02-20 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Olds Grizzlys AJHL 20 3 6 9 0.450 0.1509 0.1524 0.4171 0.4212
2008-09 Olds Grizzlys AJHL 55 19 33 52 0.946 0.3171 0.3070 0.8763 0.8484
2009-10 Olds Grizzlys AJHL 59 21 45 66 1.119 0.3752 0.3440 1.0367 0.9506
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA SR 38 13 19 32 0.842
2012-13 Alaska Anchorage D1 — SR 29 9 11 20 0.690
2011-12 Alaska Anchorage D1 — SO 21 4 10 14 0.667
2010-11 Alaska Anchorage D1 — FR 36 4 20 24 0.667
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.28
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.67
2010-11 · Alaska Anchorage
+136.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#15418
Forward overall
#523
Forward born in 1989
#290
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Aidan Verbeke
SUNY Brockport · 2013-14
0.647 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Carlos Fornaris
New England College · 2015-16
1.115 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ben Schmidling
St. Norbert · 2018-19
0.833 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.