IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andrew Gladiuk Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-03-07 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Surrey Eagles BCHL 2 0 1 1 0.500 0.1926 0.2056 0.7277 0.7768
2009-10 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 60 18 31 49 0.817 0.3147 0.3188 1.1885 1.2038
2010-11 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 60 25 40 65 1.083 0.4174 0.4032 1.5765 1.5230
2011-12 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 59 29 30 59 1.000 0.3853 0.3511 1.4553 1.3260
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Bentley D1 AHA SR 38 17 28 45 1.184
2014-15 Bentley D1 AHA JR 37 20 22 42 1.135
2013-14 Bentley D1 AHA SO 37 22 15 37 1.000
2012-13 Bentley D1 AHA FR 32 13 16 29 0.906
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.32
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.91
2012-13 · Bentley
+184.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#11072
Forward overall
#435
Forward born in 1991
#338
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Chad Anderson
Norwich · 2006-07
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Trent Flory
Utica · 2000-01
0.920 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Kelly Wosnack
St. Norbert · 2001-02
0.909 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.