IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michael Spring Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-06-14 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Trail Smoke Eaters BCHL 4 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2009-10 Trail Smoke Eaters BCHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2010-11 Quesnel Millionaires BCHL 50 10 8 18 0.360 0.1387 0.1359 0.5239 0.5132
2011-12 Chilliwack Chiefs BCHL 60 6 18 24 0.400 0.1541 0.1425 0.5821 0.5383
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC SR 28 7 7 14 0.500
2014-15 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC JR 28 5 9 14 0.500
2013-14 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC SO 26 2 7 9 0.346
2012-13 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC FR 9 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#38127
Forward overall
#1334
Forward born in 1991
#2148
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Isak Tranvik
St. Olaf · 2006-07
0.920 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Patrick Moore
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2012-13
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Parker Mismash
St. Scholastica · 2016-17
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.