icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008-09 | Trail Smoke Eaters | BCHL | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2009-10 | Trail Smoke Eaters | BCHL | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2010-11 | Quesnel Millionaires | BCHL | 50 | 10 | 8 | 18 | 0.360 | 0.1401 | 0.1372 | 0.5250 | 0.5143 |
| 2011-12 | Chilliwack Chiefs | BCHL | 60 | 6 | 18 | 24 | 0.400 | 0.1557 | 0.1440 | 0.5833 | 0.5394 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-16 | St. Scholastica | D3 | — | SR | 28 | 7 | 7 | 14 | 0.500 |
| 2014-15 | St. Scholastica | D3 | — | JR | 28 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 0.500 |
| 2013-14 | St. Scholastica | D3 | — | SO | 26 | 2 | 7 | 9 | 0.346 |
| 2012-13 | St. Scholastica | D3 | — | FR | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.