IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kyle Kramer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-04-15 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 54 12 9 21 0.389 0.1498 0.1600 0.5660 0.6047
2010-11 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 53 18 24 42 0.792 0.3054 0.3120 1.1533 1.1781
2011-12 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 60 29 27 56 0.933 0.3596 0.3476 1.3582 1.3127
2012-13 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 56 30 27 57 1.018 0.3922 0.3605 1.4813 1.3617
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Brown D1 ECAC — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2014-15 Brown D1 ECAC — 16 1 1 2 0.125
2013-14 Brown D1 ECAC — 30 3 2 5 0.167
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.30
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2013-14 · Brown
-45.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#12119
Forward overall
#489
Forward born in 1992
#401
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
Todd Skirving
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG
T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

A.J. Shiverdecker
Westfield State · 2007-08
1.208 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Danny Liscio
SUNY Morrisville · 2014-15
1.083 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Mitch Stephens
SUNY Geneseo · 2002-03
1.077 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.