IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michael Mastrodomenico Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-04-19 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Lincoln Stars USHL 37 2 6 8 0.216 0.1329 0.1329 0.6370 0.6370
2021-22 Lincoln Stars USHL 53 4 14 18 0.340 0.2088 0.2193 1.0005 1.0510
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Notre Dame D1 BigTen SR 35 5 8 13 0.371
2024-25 Notre Dame D1 BigTen SO 30 4 11 15 0.500
2023-24 Notre Dame D1 BigTen FR 33 1 6 7 0.212
2022-23 Notre Dame D1 BigTen — 22 0 1 1 0.045
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.05
2022-23 · Notre Dame
-78.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

75%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8197
Defenseman overall
#1897
Defenseman born in 2004
#2993
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Connor Clifton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Murphy
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Northland (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Jimmy Schuldt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.63 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Gage Ausmus
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Luke Voltin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Michael Aiello
UMass Dartmouth · 2005-06
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Chad Merrell
New England · 2015-16
0.611 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2000-01
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.