IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Greg Spitznagel Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-03-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 34 4 3 7 0.206 0.1215 0.1215 0.6066 0.6066
2021-22 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 35 2 4 6 0.171 0.1011 0.1006 0.5050 0.5024
2022-23 Philadelphia Rebels NAHL 53 11 20 31 0.585 0.2078 0.2050 0.6141 0.6058
2023-24 — NAHL 37 5 12 17 0.460 0.1632 0.1532 0.4824 0.4529
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Stevenson D3 MAC SO 25 7 4 11 0.440
2024-25 Stevenson D3 MAC — 20 1 2 3 0.150
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.15
2024-25 · Stevenson
0.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
50%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#31234
Forward overall
#1850
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Timmy Nicksic
St. Norbert · 2016-17
0.581 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Mitch Shaheen
Endicott · 2018-19
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Chris Stansik
Adrian · 2006-07
1.172 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.