| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 | Prince George Spruce Kings | BCHL | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.250 | 0.0963 | 0.1081 | 0.3638 | 0.4085 |
| 2011-12 | West Kelowna Warriors | BCHL | 29 | 3 | 13 | 16 | 0.552 | 0.2126 | 0.2270 | 0.8029 | 0.8574 |
| 2012-13 | West Kelowna Warriors | BCHL | 52 | 24 | 42 | 66 | 1.269 | 0.4890 | 0.4991 | 1.8471 | 1.8851 |
| 2013-14 | West Kelowna Warriors | BCHL | 56 | 20 | 42 | 62 | 1.107 | 0.4266 | 0.4157 | 1.6112 | 1.5699 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-18 | Harvard | D1 | ECAC | SR | 22 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 0.227 |
| 2016-17 | Harvard | D1 | ECAC | JR | 15 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 0.533 |
| 2015-16 | Harvard | D1 | ECAC | SO | 27 | 7 | 7 | 14 | 0.518 |
| 2014-15 | Harvard | D1 | ECAC | FR | 34 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 0.206 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.