← New Search ↗ Social Card

Bryce Eviston Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1994-08-02 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2011-12 Vernon Vipers BCHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2012-13 Vernon Vipers BCHL 50 1 3 4 0.080 0.0308 0.0319 0.1166 0.1206
2013-14 Brooks Bandits AJHL 7 0 3 3 0.429 0.1438 0.1413 0.3972 0.3904
2014-15 Philadelphia Flyers Elite USPHL-Premier-Classic 50 4 19 23 0.460 0.1291 0.1247 0.3789 0.3660
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Trinity D1 SR 8 0 1 1 0.125
2018-19 Trinity D3 NESCAC SR 8 0 1 1 0.125
2017-18 Trinity D3 NESCAC JR 2 0 0 0 0.000
2016-17 Trinity D3 NESCAC SO 4 0 0 0 0.000
2015-16 Trinity D3 NESCAC FR 16 0 2 2 0.125
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2015-16 · Trinity
0.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#18922
Defenseman overall
#2034
Defenseman born in 1994

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Brockport · 2004-05
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2007-08
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Becker · 2009-10
0.467 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.