IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Riley Rosenthal Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-12-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 42 0 3 3 0.071 0.0421 0.0421 0.2144 0.2144
2021-22 — USHL 54 2 7 9 0.167 0.0983 0.1015 0.5007 0.5170
2022-23 Omaha Lancers USHL 26 1 3 4 0.154 0.0907 0.0889 0.4619 0.4529
2023-24 Odessa Jackalopes NAHL 48 3 13 16 0.333 0.1225 0.1196 0.3518 0.3435
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Colby D3 NESCAC SO 21 1 5 6 0.286
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2025-26 · Colby
+182.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15002
Defenseman overall
#2816
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

David MacGregor
UMass Boston · 2014-15
0.419 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Bryan Hovanec
Lebanon Valley · 2014-15
0.760 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Hanewall
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2017-18
0.864 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.