IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Benjamin Israel Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1994-03-31 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 — BCHL 49 8 16 24 0.490 0.1887 0.1919 0.7124 0.7246
2013-14 Coquitlam Express BCHL 30 1 10 11 0.367 0.1413 0.1372 0.5333 0.5178
2014-15 Jersey Hitmen USPHL-Premier-Classic 37 3 25 28 0.757 0.2124 0.2016 0.6222 0.5905
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Colorado College D1 NCHC — 38 2 2 4 0.105
2017-18 Colorado College D1 NCHC — 37 1 10 11 0.297
2016-17 Colorado College D1 NCHC — 26 0 6 6 0.231
2015-16 Colorado College D1 NCHC — 32 2 5 7 0.219
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.22
2015-16 · Colorado College
+31.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#8199
Defenseman overall
#1213
Defenseman born in 1994

D1 Comparables

Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Thor Hansen
Keene State · 2023-24
0.708 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brodie Tutton
SUNY Geneseo · 2014-15
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Spencer Korona
Trinity · 2021-22
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.