IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Daniel Nachbaur Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-09-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Merritt Centennials BCHL 35 6 7 13 0.371 0.1445 0.1511 0.5416 0.5665
2014-15 — BCHL 42 9 5 14 0.333 0.1297 0.1296 0.4861 0.4858
2015-16 Wenatchee Wild BCHL 30 4 3 7 0.233 0.0908 0.0859 0.3402 0.3218
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 UMass Boston D3 HockeyEast SR 25 7 22 29 1.160
2018-19 UMass Boston D3 HockeyEast JR 28 9 12 21 0.750
2017-18 UMass Boston D3 HockeyEast SO 26 7 11 18 0.692
2016-17 UMass Boston D3 HockeyEast FR 20 3 4 7 0.350
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.35
2016-17 · UMass Boston
+295.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#34588
Forward overall
#1454
Forward born in 1995
#2833
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Nick DeCenzo
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

David Becker
Bethel · 2014-15
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Brodie Jamieson
Marian · 2012-13
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Trevor Turner
New England College · 2005-06
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.