IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Phil Johansson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1994-09-08 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Surrey Eagles BCHL 53 1 11 12 0.226 0.0881 0.0875 0.3302 0.3279
2014-15 Hawkesbury Hawks CCHL 59 5 22 27 0.458 0.1306 0.1223 0.3542 0.3316
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Amherst D3 NESCAC SR 26 6 14 20 0.769
2017-18 Amherst D3 NESCAC JR 17 4 12 16 0.941
2016-17 Amherst D3 NESCAC SO 23 3 7 10 0.435
2015-16 Amherst D3 NESCAC FR 27 7 3 10 0.370
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.37
2015-16 · Amherst
+262.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#10583
Defenseman overall
#1452
Defenseman born in 1994

D1 Comparables

Jake Flynn
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UConn (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Zink
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Casey Nelson
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brett Brazier
Middlebury · 2008-09
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Wally Cossette
St. John's · 2010-11
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Fackey
New England College · 2004-05
0.792 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.