IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mark Hamilton Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1994-01-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Vernon Vipers BCHL 24 3 2 5 0.208 0.0803 0.0770 0.3031 0.2907
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Maine D1 HockeyEast SR 25 0 1 1 0.040
2016-17 Maine D1 HockeyEast JR 34 2 10 12 0.353
2015-16 Maine D1 HockeyEast SO 37 0 6 6 0.162
2014-15 Maine D1 HockeyEast FR 39 1 6 7 0.179
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.18
2014-15 · Maine
+146.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#20869
Defenseman overall
#2174
Defenseman born in 1994
#2924
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Fuller
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Southern Maine (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Joseph Fiala
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Parker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Logan Anderson
Bethel · 2021-22
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick O'Connor
Colby · 2014-15
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Bobby Marshall
Lebanon Valley · 2006-07
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.