IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joey Colatarci Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-02-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 5 0 2 2 0.400 0.1541 0.1566 0.5821 0.5916
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Adrian D1 NCHA SR 26 7 18 25 0.962
2019-20 Adrian D3 NCHA SR 26 7 18 25 0.962
2018-19 Adrian D1 NCHA JR 29 4 7 11 0.379
2018-19 Adrian D3 NCHA JR 29 4 7 11 0.379
2017-18 Adrian D3 NCHA SO 23 1 7 8 0.348
2016-17 Adrian D3 NCHA FR 28 3 13 16 0.571
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.57
2016-17 · Adrian
+286.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

Garret Cockerill
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Justin Woods
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Johnny Wingels
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Miami
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tim Davison
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Eric Sweetman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Trevor Pray
SUNY Brockport · 2016-17
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Sean Fish
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2003-04
0.926 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Steven Sleep
St. Norbert · 2002-03
0.516 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.