IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Josh Cronin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-04-07 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Chilliwack Chiefs BCHL 4 0 1 1 0.250 0.0963 0.0984 0.3633 0.3713
2014-15 Weyburn Red Wings SJHL 50 1 12 13 0.260 0.0666 0.0653 0.1956 0.1917
2015-16 Weyburn Red Wings SJHL 50 1 11 12 0.240 0.0615 0.0572 0.1806 0.1681
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Norwich D1 LittleEast SR 26 1 4 5 0.192
2019-20 Norwich D3 LittleEast SR 26 1 4 5 0.192
2018-19 Norwich D1 LittleEast JR 15 1 3 4 0.267
2018-19 Norwich D3 LittleEast JR 15 1 3 4 0.267
2017-18 Norwich D3 LittleEast SO 0 0 0 0 0.000
2016-17 Norwich D3 LittleEast FR 8 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#21211
Defenseman overall
#2319
Defenseman born in 1995

D1 Comparables

Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Andrew Kimball
Lake Forest · 2021-22
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Todd Krupa
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2007-08
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Coalson Wolford
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2021-22
0.238 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.