IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jackson Morehouse Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-04-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Omaha Lancers USHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 38 8 6 14 0.368 0.1419 0.1443 0.5368 0.5460
2022-23 Cowichan Valley Capitals BCHL 22 1 4 5 0.227 0.0876 0.0848 0.3312 0.3206
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Middlebury D3 NESCAC SR 27 5 11 16 0.593
2024-25 Middlebury D3 NESCAC JR 26 10 12 22 0.846
2023-24 Middlebury D3 NESCAC SO 24 5 7 12 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2023-24 · Middlebury
+437.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
40%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#35093
Forward overall
#2143
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brendan Bell
Hamilton · 2002-03
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Tom Schmidt
Wisconsin-Stout · 2014-15
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Dunagan
Saint John's · 2012-13
0.522 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.