← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nick Roukounakis Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-09-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Thayer Academy NE-Prep 26 5 7 12 0.462 0.0914 0.0914 0.2103 0.2103
2019-20 Thayer Academy NE-Prep 27 6 6 12 0.444 0.0880 0.0880 0.2025 0.2025
2020-21 U.S. National U18 Team NTDP-U18 5 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 West Kelowna Warriors BCHL 28 9 6 15 0.536 0.2064 0.2145 0.7796 0.8101
2022-23 Tri-City Storm USHL 32 5 5 10 0.312 0.1843 0.1784 0.9386 0.9084
2023-24 Tri-City Storm USHL 19 2 4 6 0.316 0.1863 0.1711 0.9485 0.8709
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Boston University D1 HockeyEast SO 25 5 2 7 0.280
2024-25 Boston University D1 HockeyEast 21 0 5 5 0.238
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.24
2024-25 · Boston University
+59.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
55%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#29231
Forward overall
#1687
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bryn Athyn · 2016-17
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Babson · 2017-18
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2004-05
1.192 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.