← New Search ↗ Social Card

Quinn Thompson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-07-14 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 14 0 2 2 0.143 0.0551 0.0572 0.2080 0.2161
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 University of Rhode Island ACHA_D1 24 1 1 2 0.083
2024-25 University of Rhode Island ACHA_D1 24 1 1 2 0.083
2023-24 University of Rhode Island ACHA_D1 24 1 1 2 0.083
2022-23 University of Rhode Island ACHA_D1 24 1 1 2 0.083
2021-22 University of Rhode Island ACHA_D1 24 1 1 2 0.083
2020-21 University of Rhode Island ACHA_D1 24 1 1 2 0.083
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.08
2020-21 · University of Rhode Island
+70.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#57072
Forward overall
#2780
Forward born in 1996
#3239
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Boston College (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Curry · 2014-15
0.450 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Western New England · 2013-14
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Norbert · 2012-13
0.690 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.