IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nick Fiorentino Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-10-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 New Jersey Rockets EHL 10 0 3 3 0.300 0.0693 0.0773 0.1468 0.1638
2014-15 New Jersey Rockets EHL 42 9 11 20 0.476 0.1100 0.1176 0.2330 0.2490
2015-16 Merritt Centennials BCHL 58 9 29 38 0.655 0.2524 0.2524 0.9535 0.9535
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Trinity D3 NESCAC GR 23 2 0 2 0.087
2018-19 Trinity D3 NESCAC SR 28 6 7 13 0.464
2017-18 Trinity D3 NESCAC JR 26 1 5 6 0.231
2016-17 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast — 0 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#7623
Defenseman overall
#1276
Defenseman born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Nelson Armstrong
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Murray
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.74 PPG
→ Hamline (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Tommy Davis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Princeton (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Dakota Mermis
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Denver (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Eric Schurhamer
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Maine (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Michael Leone
Utica · 2006-07
1.462 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jonah Alexander
Hobart · 2018-19
0.840 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brian Sanzone
Colby · 2016-17
0.385 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.