IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matthew Burchill Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Bay State Breakers USPHL-Premier-Classic 50 5 17 22 0.440 0.1235 0.1235 0.3618 0.3618
2015-16 Wenatchee Wild BCHL 28 1 6 7 0.250 0.0963 0.0963 0.3638 0.3638
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Norwich D3 LittleEast — 28 0 8 8 0.286
2018-19 Norwich D3 LittleEast — 21 1 4 5 0.238
2017-18 Norwich D3 LittleEast — 17 0 3 3 0.176
2016-17 Air Force D1 AHA — 6 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#17440
Defenseman overall

D1 Comparables

Kyle Mackey
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Air Force (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Zach Yoder
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.10 PPG
→ Air Force (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Jake Bischoff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Ruslan Pedan
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Lukas Buchta
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.05 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Gabriel Filion
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2022-23
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Alexander Laseen
Curry · 2004-05
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Scott Taje
Lake Forest · 2000-01
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.