← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nolan Zweep Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-09-25 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 BCHL 23 1 2 3 0.130 0.0486 0.0508 0.1900 0.1986
2016-17 Chilliwack Chiefs BCHL 51 0 9 9 0.176 0.0657 0.0653 0.2572 0.2557
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Western New England D3 CNE GR 24 3 6 9 0.375
2020-21 Western New England D3 CNE SR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Western New England D1 JR 25 12 8 20 0.800
2019-20 Western New England D3 CNE JR 25 12 8 20 0.800
2018-19 Western New England D1 SO 19 0 2 2 0.105
2018-19 Western New England D3 CNE SO 19 0 2 2 0.105
2017-18 Western New England D3 CNE FR 25 1 7 8 0.320
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.32
2017-18 · Western New England
+528.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#55559
Forward overall
#2950
Forward born in 1997
#3555
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Colgate
0.14 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Plattsburgh · 2023-24
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2009-10
0.273 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Framingham State · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.