IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Conor Lovett Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-04-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Lawrence Academy NE-Prep 29 4 5 9 0.310 0.0615 0.0615 0.1414 0.1414
2019-20 Lawrence Academy NE-Prep 27 9 4 13 0.481 0.0954 0.0954 0.2194 0.2194
2021-22 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 59 16 16 32 0.542 0.3200 0.2876 1.6290 1.4641
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 New Hampshire D1 HockeyEast — 35 5 1 6 0.171
2023-24 New Hampshire D1 HockeyEast — 20 1 2 3 0.150
2022-23 New Hampshire D1 HockeyEast — 29 1 1 2 0.069
2020-21 Merrimack D1 HockeyEast FR 15 3 2 5 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2020-21 · Merrimack
+375.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
20%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#26051
Forward overall
#1328
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mike Rey
Neumann · 2009-10
1.071 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Nicholas Weber
Post · 2021-22
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
A.J. Tucker
St. Scholastica · 2004-05
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.